From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 31C2B3858D33; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:35:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 31C2B3858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681367728;
	bh=Yz2BYcco3ayQv705wLQnHmQ+ACsMLUCCtZJjtTOovh4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=crx5iBQjnmVilCH427OMdplz3KdwVvF6RPRzGh4GEi3ZEKMd51rIrwzyyVBp6YYY6
	 iH0TJpXGGv5GHnW7tUqT0dhFflzFgy1zRhHcXioy/cmdCK3vHi61DbZUxs1rO5PmE/
	 rLHhTv1y6NFuin0SF5o5up8ZjsrGyWndey2Y/qQE=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109493] Broken O2 optimization on s390x in GCC 13
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:35:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109493-4-wYo6JDceKl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109493-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109493-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109493

--- Comment #3 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's unclear to me from the reports if this started with GCC 13 or if it al=
ways
failed on s390x. Could you clarify? Thanks.=