public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/109500] SIGABRT when calling a function that returns an unallocated value
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 19:02:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109500-4-TW64jh06gp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109500

--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> ---
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 05:25:20PM +0000, leandro.lupori at linaro dot org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109500
> 
> I'm trying to check with the issue reporter how extensive is his usage of this
> extension and how much effort it would require for him to avoid using it.
> 

It's not an extension.  It is a bug in the original
Fortran code.  The Fortran standard requires a function
result to be available at the completion of execution
of a function reference.  The code in the original
bug report clearly violates this.

Note 1 in Fortran 2023, Sec. 8.5.3, p. 100, is non-normative
text.  I suppose one can claim that gfortran should throw an
error when a function result is marked with the allocatable
attribute.  Unfortunately, it is likely a catch-22 situation
in that gfortran needs to know the function result is allocatable
so it can do the allocaton within the function, but it is not
an allocatable outside of the function.  Not sure gfortran
can mark an internal symbol to do both.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-19 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-13 13:24 [Bug fortran/109500] New: " leandro.lupori at linaro dot org
2023-04-13 15:05 ` [Bug fortran/109500] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-13 17:06 ` leandro.lupori at linaro dot org
2023-04-13 18:12 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-13 18:32 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-13 19:44 ` leandro.lupori at linaro dot org
2023-04-13 21:28 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-13 21:34 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2023-04-14 19:24 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-16 19:42 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-17 12:14 ` leandro.lupori at linaro dot org
2023-04-17 20:20 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-19 17:25 ` leandro.lupori at linaro dot org
2023-04-19 19:02 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu [this message]
2023-04-19 19:06 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-19 19:15 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-19 19:42 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2023-04-19 21:03 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-20  5:22 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-20 16:29 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2023-04-20 19:02 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-20 19:04 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-20 20:02 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-22 18:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-23 18:59 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109500-4-TW64jh06gp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).