From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2AE5C3858D32; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:27:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2AE5C3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681464471;
	bh=+L2iHyqfc8W6GRKeOfrq9DW8LdTQ6/k+GS8q1eBRIpU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mRNAukAATlKSumqqeVigevLac2kHHelMWta3aHekYQo1OR37Q7RsS4qXDalVieYZE
	 YDSBcgqb343Wl6HrIA3s+qnYktfrGcW3UQzNK2zGsowZIJrrnWsS2WZjMt1UIfYBnt
	 HF/H+SshrT87GjbndZ94AyuAoyNw20TMM+Jf8qj8=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/109510] [13 Regression] bootstrap with Ada broken on
 aarch64
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:27:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109510-4-SU3BGjgFUd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109510-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109510-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109510

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2)
> > > Maybe Eric can clarify which type kinds in Ada can have TYPE_USER_ALI=
GN and
> > > _not_ a TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT without.
> >=20
> > All of them, TYPE_USER_ALIGN is supposed to be orthogonal to type varia=
nts.
>=20
> How do you get at the alignment the type would have when the user didn't
> specify it?  That's what the call ABI is supposed to look at.
>=20
> /* 1 if the alignment for this type was requested by "aligned" attribute,
>    0 if it is the default for this type.  */
> #define TYPE_USER_ALIGN(NODE) (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->base.u.bits.user_align)
>=20
> so what's the "default" alignment?

Btw, we're talking about non-aggregate types here.=