From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E10AC3858D20; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 21:12:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E10AC3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681593175;
	bh=PqoUcQAsV1M5o2DyeLY4Ca6jPGkhrSLznFyKeVxSWv0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VSaa4rVTOUoMDXIA1J76cIcEy9i8DIHzad/w31c/paPMz6RhgvVAWjm7svlvo6wpT
	 EhFSFIP/Lvhrw1HmKnEKQiw4qW1GW0NlxkpAcywdtFudX/KaisWuL5Q5oHBsGsJQFf
	 43FIBozvbZ0GV2NbVZVEZwBeWlHdsbb0oSBA8oEw=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109524] [13 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
 remove_unreachable::remove_and_update_globals (tree-vrp.cc:136) with -O3
 -fno-tree-forwprop -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-fre
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 21:12:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109524-4-02jYLmk2PH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109524-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109524

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> That only moves it by a single revision back - r13-3595-g7b1cdca6d6d594a

Which actually makes sense as the most reduced testcase has
__builtin_unreachable in it. I am not sure if the original non-reduced test=
case
(which was not attached here had a function which returned without a return
value or not).=