From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C1FFD3858D20; Wed, 31 May 2023 21:00:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C1FFD3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685566853;
	bh=DhAjhUtIu0W3AsC5LOe3YJmEtMBIbGK/WCfskbc0D5w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YmPW/KmiJbr5/yff6H+dnnSfznjrkMhAQzqs8o2hK1cGPmpSgZzCKL3GuJmjNYqDO
	 oabEFO2MAVwunJ0mFp+TqBCyb53Ca9E3Lh7q87OVMz+pTI9Xhl+ZD4/keea4LKE4FZ
	 eB3Lyo3kmBBz+NDnUWtqdLQEiVVwSNd7wSZtrWxc=
From: "vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109541] [12/13/14 regression] ICE in
 extract_constrain_insn on when building rhash-1.4.3
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 21:00:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109541-4-YPuMLXzCCq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109541

--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7)
> The problem is that LRA assigns a floating-point register to the PIC
> pseudo-register (pic_offset_table_rtx) and the SPARC back-end is not
> prepared for it.
>=20
> Vladimir, would it be feasible to prevent this from happening?

Sorry, I can not reproduce it on gcc-11, gcc-12, and master using -O1
-mcpu=3Dniagara4 -fpic -c a-sha512.i.

Fortunately, I can reproduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108703.  So I'll start on PR=
108703
first.=