From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4476A385828F; Thu,  1 Feb 2024 22:12:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4476A385828F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1706825572;
	bh=epRwcJ/grme1bLtZAWM+o4eJlCWxHDr9SL3aU7b8gWI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Huw3bDr7xuRS2EDsdWeYzY68tiOTOPZU/YnkMISOFQzdNPzPO/rSBsFXfyBIphjG7
	 5c1YUosmlSW1+jFOY51QYaAsqHQLxq+JM/MbTtNEMT5V6HtzWyZzmqjtSiD1LiLwMt
	 t0XCSw5ivDT5Mr0xF3mISQHHwsswktXUzs2nPDIg=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/109559] [12/13/14 Regression] Unexpected
 -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning when inlining with system header
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 22:12:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-109559-4-Fnzow6JiKo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109559

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW

--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry, that wasn't part of the test.

```
# 0 "" 3
struct function_base {
  has_trivial_copy_and_destroy() const;
  int functor;
};
struct function1 : function_base {
  swap(function1) { has_trivial_copy_and_destroy(); }
};
struct function : function1 {
  template <typename Functor> operator=3D(Functor) { swap(*this); }
};
# 4 ""
struct FilonIntegral {
  double integrate() const;
};
double FilonIntegral::integrate() const {
  function f1;
  f1 =3D [] {};
  return 0;
}
```=