From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 016F13858C50; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 09:32:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 016F13858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1682328748; bh=dIGohp5mlLBXLytBcNjz79SNrcm3VuH9oTyBbLT7lRU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PL9kXJZDZJNrKJ2K6N/SSECwSD4FO5JoNQaRRWMZBVrGR24J05BH9HcbmI92dRuJn A1UbFpHyDDmbXiAATQDyQgDwZhro5DaRwh9NcMyh3rFX/f/wD0EUpx83XEJY8ecUeY rTqI3L8/V+XdG1o6pyImNJq/BY0MZPaRNNw0nwY4= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/109566] [13/14 Regression] powerpc: unrecognizable insn for -mcpu=e6500, -mcpu=power3, ..., -mcpu=power10 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 09:32:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109566 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, --target powerpc-rtems6 reproduces it, wonder what is different here. Reduced testcase: void foo (double x) { union { double d; unsigned i; } u; u.d =3D x; if (u.i & 2146435072) return; else for (;;) ; }=