From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8B9B53858D37; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:10:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8B9B53858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1682025045; bh=o+BGNNhhdDVJZ64y7y6FSb++JDGEc8w3WUhbu/fkd7c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KfPOwJb21WKP+gN4NDDh1duuwpLva1R7+uen5u0AoELwFh73Mqbmhf7HWlFC2rLtn dZpmKpohm7m/YekL/E4/59irgZQ0cP9aPSJ2RcpJenfey21cP0Y52V0KwiMaguibKW Tswb4AkMeK/1wo5U69pOERAb+reepkmKcCjGwz3M= From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/109575] Implement runtime check for valid function result Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:10:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc everconfirmed bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on priority Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109575 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2023-04-20 Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Change status to "new" as I agree with Harald that this would be a nice run= time warning for debugging. Changed to 'P4'=