From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 42DAD3858C74; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:49:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 42DAD3858C74 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1682027370; bh=XshUgOdmEhdTP2DlRYNwefa28NE/5mtbAXBkGr2tIxs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wjWxo+HMeJIz/j4J1vH+vewY4de8YizCkmQP49RCxrVDr/sasX/INrq7o0nMT6YYj /FAvr7fbGv0hXX6OBlnORGwCpE/GjwtkJ2iL04dvUNF1Avq5f8+6CwDNmdKOogawBP lftI1qjzyIfZ6FQJCH9w0zsWA8uUexC43kVK848Y= From: "vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/109578] fail to remove dead code due to division by zero Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:49:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109578 --- Comment #4 from Vincent Lef=C3=A8vre --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Anyways maybe the issue with PR 29968 was a scheduling issue which was fi= xed > later on that GCC didn't realize divide could trap. OK, thanks, I can see your update marking PR 29968 as a duplicate of PR 412= 39 (fixed).=