From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6F85F3858C50; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 07:50:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6F85F3858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682236251;
	bh=RD9++90wO7/Xz7rA75fuIjTowHXFdZr1vnjUCRnouyI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QOsitQsV1RkqjxpG0qEngYynrqfrKPmmBW8CadneNCAyCE+3W87Fk+/CQ0HZRbMDP
	 rRd/B0RvMOakdLKugs3gI4XLcgdPvZxwArv8Ik54/LQj9qnIZJiM10TUWvDlux8Y5y
	 M/bcXRhJV19APwL58WKyVJwjzh+VBlPZMwm4EXI0=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/109585] Carla/sord miscompiled with -O2 on
 ARM64 with flexible array member
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 07:50:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: alias, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109585-4-vsGbgRe5sz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109585-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109585-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109585

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #16 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hector Martin from comment #15)
> The prior repro was too complex and depended on other environmental stuff
> (some other people couldn't repro it on arm64 either), so please ignore i=
t.
> If the reduced repro triggers the issue, it's the same bug.

I can reproduce the issue with the reduced repro on x86_64-linux-gnu too.=