From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 87AA33858C66; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:36:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 87AA33858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713008186;
	bh=Jddr6XJnL/WD9A/5XkaVDUgHVe7vj4oqAqaSfZ0+BoI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Rg4AgpmpqK3u0BmPo7YDwGemqU/KVqgdVwcxdMYId5hAXIjgTuY6h3cTlXZJW08xZ
	 9phu2sl3L15x4IWJZM+Usk8lM+W+HJkoKp8V/dcWqPopri/t/kgtQbKzILm1m9DILG
	 lCYOtkt8ofmZcwjZiWHk9Qbr7tRWjhE3G2WZvYVs=
From: "haochen.jiang at intel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/109596] [14 Regression] Lots of guality testcase
 fails on x86_64 after r14-162-gcda246f8b421ba
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 11:36:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail, wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: haochen.jiang at intel dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109596-4-FQZXehDT77@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109596-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109596-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109596

--- Comment #18 from Haochen Jiang <haochen.jiang at intel dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> (In reply to Carlos Eduardo Seo from comment #15)
> > I see some failures after this patch on aarch64-linux-gnu:
> >=20
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54693-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
> > -fno-fat-lto-objects  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 21 x =3D=3D 10 - i
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54693-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
> > -fno-fat-lto-objects  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 21 y =3D=3D 20 - 2 * i
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54693-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
> > -fno-fat-lto-objects  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 21 z =3D=3D 30 - 3 * i
> >=20
> > Could you please take a look?
>=20
> I suspect it is similar to what was already discussed here:=20
>=20
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-April/649347.html

Yes. As Richard said, the FAIL are exactly the same before Honza's patch, I
suppose expected.=