From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8F9753858C78; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:28:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8F9753858C78 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1710887286; bh=c5b5PRaP39lgKAhh3Jm96XZJ/v096m63pBRfppUTtow=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oC81Yzkjsm7OkillpPqf44D6wgBkaAAdEKodjUruS+bmxfDRncEtAUyu2yRAhdXkg GCPGFGWHJFmKTic9wK3OKzp5dCBcBrv1bls45r7lxjGKoE4sihTJ6ZXjQD28EFyWCv FvOW7urbXFDQ12gfzL7yhETSxyV3eoR/Q9Asth5M= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/109596] [14 Regression] Lots of guality testcase fails on x86_64 after r14-162-gcda246f8b421ba Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:28:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail, wrong-debug X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109596 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- BTW, just curious, r14-162 had: /* Ensure that the header will have just the latch as a predecessor inside the loop. */ - if (!single_pred_p (exit->dest)) + if (!single_pred_p (nonexit->dest)) { - header =3D split_edge (exit); + header =3D split_edge (nonexit); exit =3D single_pred_edge (header); } chunk, shouldn't that be nonexit =3D single_pred_edge (header); or is that = line correct?=