From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BD15C3858C74; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:46:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BD15C3858C74
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682365573;
	bh=9lxwCF9ZQRHE/vo0znfiTgkrbeX95jzjzl0HYNydl4I=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ezcmrFAofmob5vaFNRC7JtO/VfYVwH4SF8PWfCvQCN4eTtzMz0hXhO42k3sv58snw
	 1yZAB8AKZvpyqoEjNEFIBLe/Rfyo1jYELOA8/EDzrOMw91uq1rVdzBEnKAsj8Jabf0
	 SZc74glQItUXN7EhGz6RJNCepAOxRklNAqnJhC3g=
From: "arsen at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109602] Import Gentoo msgfmt patch ?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:46:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-109602-4-dA8ht7Y1X4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109602

Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Romain Geissler from comment #5)
> Hi,
>=20
> My intention was to try to raise upstream an issue that people packaging =
gcc
> may hit in some cases. Gentoo has such a patch, but I also have a similar
> one on my side since couple of years, it's only yesterday that I discover=
ed
> Gentoo had one too (and Alpine Linux). I am not a user of Gentoo nor Alpi=
ne
> Linux myself, I just also package my own gcc.
>=20
> So I apologize to the Gentoo and Gcc communities if I offended anyone by
> opening this bug report, that was not the intention.

no worries, I doubt anyone took offense.  we (Gentoo) try to work as closel=
y as
possible with upstream GCC, so usually a patch being on our end only means =
that
nobody reworked it to be upstreamable.  if in doubt, you can email
toolchain@gentoo.org - we'd be happy to answer.

in this instance, the 'fix' we use is not applicable in the general case, s=
ince
it doesn't solve the general problem of building a downgraded gcc, so we ne=
ver
upstreamed it.

PS: the general issue is reported, marking as dupe

have a lovely day!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105688 ***=