From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A13D2385841C; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:16:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A13D2385841C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682514960;
	bh=j4YcEHFNrOwEyBm/CARVWvc373RxSp9OmiqfnwQoLCs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=g4NkYCBs6x4vKh/mtI+99JItwLc1Lv0g1liOZYxZEtMO3cWA5nuQ53MJUB67ed7dc
	 VOhy7uK7uKXOIxgKzofXpXxHdy3rp/kISSgcGegj6G1d7Gw+tGGS5vzuLXZDgHXhg0
	 XwmAJnCi+KYOGXKAOPKTXGYV6efhKBgpnwwTF000=
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/109607] IPA replaces stmt with invalid gimple
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 13:16:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109607-4-1xeh18nGRN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109607-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109607-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109607

--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #0)
> On cfghooks.cc we replace
>=20
> BIT_FIELD_REF <*this_8(D), 8, 56>
>=20

An alternative (perhaps for the release branches) would be to avoid SRA if =
the
parameter takes place in souch constructs.

But the patch in comment #2 looks like just the right thing to do.=