From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 31D4A3858D3C; Fri,  2 Jun 2023 22:56:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 31D4A3858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685746570;
	bh=dTlUyR0L0fHQctkHRL6SZTkHNH0aYPtCz9c1pinNfQw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=vwZShIqzJEsjJQKUS6qR4d1HW34mKMZG60lQkkScmixsVqLpeY8YZg8gpY3cTTK5E
	 COvRFhAYzNE3B0/UBRhld77bAx8w6DOXfz+8Ilfm72uZzrTWAOGze0AHHzPGA0FhN0
	 mV3eQCfTOaKZyUyW2vRIQAOHp4CaMWln5gtwyK+Q=
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109610] [14 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dform-3.c
 fails after r14-172-g0368d169492017
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 22:56:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109610-4-zlpKcRwFLZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109610-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109610-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109610

--- Comment #15 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Bill, the original patch went in before GCC 13 was released and I only see a
trunk/GCC 14 fix.  Is dform-3.c still broken when testing GCC 13?  Ie, do we
need a backport of the fix?=