From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C33AA3854161; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 08:40:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C33AA3854161
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682498432;
	bh=Kph/00cXakOUIuGrqMKb5mQ9L1Zt3LUh4IwXC7BwAwM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AuER1IWy62Qo3h1iIRqimAEB2KMvBkWIgt23jZMbRO249qeN4sOByCg4nFAPQOtPh
	 TGNEL/BJPY3ly9JZRMYvrlSHNB6rCS1YgVMrFpMgcVywp3Nxk4x+g6+tVnjykUG9zK
	 Gxk1Qz7/JFCyGfeAAPUY/+IPbr7tydeX1YolkWSc=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvMTA5NjI1XSBbMTQgcmVncmVzc2lvbl0gJ2Vycm9y?=
 =?UTF-8?B?OiB1c2Ugb2YgYnVpbHQtaW4gdHJhaXQg4oCYX190eXBlX3BhY2tfZWxlbWVu?=
 =?UTF-8?B?dDxzaXplb2YgLi4uIChUIC4uLikgLSAxLCBUIC4uLj7igJkgaW4gZnVuY3Rp?=
 =?UTF-8?B?b24gc2lnbmF0dXJlOyB1c2UgbGlicmFyeSB0cmFpdHMgaW5zdGVhZCcgd2hl?=
 =?UTF-8?B?biBidWlsZGluZyBmb2xseQ==?=
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 08:40:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109625-4-DW3Cqy6a6x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109625-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109625-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109625

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 from comment #1)
> do we want to match what clang does here?

No, this is an intentional choice.=