From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 861393858C53; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:23:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 861393858C53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682522633;
	bh=o0iPlPSTq5B0m9RkomAREmVjGSaYZKenexr3hAUYzkw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OPhz4dEB23GJX1ckWlD9jylxUgw1mkTpnUJgJq4ZaKbeG+/0vHvRkBMU0k7HTnQiB
	 YKeNRqgf6gbuXYy91eX78b4KjRbdiS3gbgvPXJF8uUgImriwZoZHIEVf1mDRhBy0fA
	 YDx8tUotUvfmH2rFm6B94RPby+DFto3HV6c0gXc8=
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109632] Inefficient codegen when complex numbers are
 emulated with structs
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 15:23:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109632-4-KkMZW9aAmD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109632-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109632-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109632

--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
note that even if we can't stop SLP, we should be able to generate as effic=
ient
code by being creative about the instruction selection, that's why I marked=
 it
as a target bug :)=