From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7BEB03858438; Tue, 23 May 2023 19:16:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7BEB03858438
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684869378;
	bh=PzBQlKCaxPMEdvGSaXpIBmmO7YQBvRkjFH2t3g2+9H0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Te/DMmDLndOrwoLmWg5ERHS12iKXIwSO+letORIk+NKKe7X2dCL+rZSyENa+ql3j4
	 dxozemXCjkdvAyQAro76i0EuxaXAyVJULIIGAWJdZ8qUZBCdF4+K9KU/3l4P0CcDCj
	 Nnv/tMkPnui6zEP7QxHFl46lGfx3G79Tc39WwvNo=
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109632] Inefficient codegen when complex numbers are
 emulated with structs
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 19:16:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109632-4-gBp4nXT22t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109632-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109632-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109632

--- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg> ---
The patch in comment 11 is just a related spot improvement.
The PR itself is still unfixed.=