From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DCDC33858C60; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 19:16:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DCDC33858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682536567;
	bh=g3JHbmBjvAKfSBZkxChyciZNXQPnzF6scDrSSGB0MJA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JptrkdcGe6Y7Yd1yeK1FlNQOqjb6NvjFhwG7AnLNBQLJfAF3gNM4uoH2fVRh7K3jn
	 OzBnqAtJvpOk0NqU/ozjHjCE6xaqZpRBdHrUDZ619E03lbVVd86S4bbtCmCUzpQc+T
	 GOVg3w43Uv5VA288C6Tf3mj8MD2jiFbKJovASP0I=
From: "amacleod at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109637] unnecessary range check in complete
 switch on bitfield
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 19:16:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: amacleod at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109637-4-rE0ZpfRzM2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109637-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109637-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109637

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
Perhaps switch conv just needs to look at it...=