From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7BD6C3858C60; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:34:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7BD6C3858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682555696;
	bh=v8YZgMtFa5u4d6VWyt9/Laytd4f5q6RZ9sZkJ6xsbh8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LIi7T4IfwE+7hthrHHFGJSMkP7OJKqk+nHZM2l5BHKFO8iZ8UASLQyr31ZhWFzI6M
	 Mq/TTczHxicbIzWSUndb1yh8gmPR642EHpFVDy4bKzHslK4xpwA8rZVHKxLbwX6uoM
	 VF4icOWHagcBHDrZX3uDQ6tsfyM5WBJjP00LLqL4=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109639] [14 regression] Internal compiler
 error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have addr_expr in to_wide, at
 tree.h:6283
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:34:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109639-4-aIr1iZ4OCK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109639-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109639-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109639

--- Comment #1 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> gcc (Gentoo 14.0.0.9999 p, commit 7546d8be5a8ae93e81535644c2578807db276ab=
6)
> 14.0.0 20230426 (experimental)

This commit is wrong (recorded incorrectly). I'm changing something in our
packaging to record the upstream commit correctly vs the commit after any
patches.

Anyway, reducing.=