From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F2D7D3858CDA; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 01:37:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F2D7D3858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682645868;
	bh=OPd8TnklNEb3eQCJ53P4Ws7itj7u7gYpJLECyidoBvo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mepI2WMzU/UfMsMunMmcr5gzJQHGzxAgZa0vW7QQhKctO5XBXFA9RlPvcy8N9ADs2
	 ddXmyTEO2/n2klTp5h5S7t1eG91WMp4TKg3oZI9gNjCVOtQe/tO5pKB/asugLQCSVB
	 mYRN7ksJIIJjZrOs6bOUDtvy8Trzy27OKdBQOmy0=
From: "adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator
 (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones.
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 01:37:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109641-4-0RsyAmSFzZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109641-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109641-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109641

--- Comment #8 from Adelson Oliveira <adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com> ---
Then I should have defined the operations with double precision as well?=