From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BA1633858CDB; Sat, 29 Apr 2023 02:20:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA1633858CDB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1682734843; bh=HvrWt+FnpyHhtwHMLKwhUzmcZzHUDPAgwwanKlSw1B4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aVC/vGT/OArn+6KEAOgJTMALGlTV2xxSctkU0ukiEqZcI08MknT26jW+7vt9GKbIQ h10Tbn0eR5JMuO1g2bzmre+bPzSGQpjuFnBUFT93TfhPDWcAhYJtl0G4sR6szTl3co 6MtDTM2K7LeO2sSjOypA9Za2dj4K3QWQt9vKyH2g= From: "adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/109641] Gfortran fails to overload intrinsic operator (*) if operands are complex. It works with real ones. Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 02:20:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: adelson.oliveira at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109641 --- Comment #11 from Adelson Oliveira -= -- I'm a linux user and gfortran comes with my distro. I mean, I did not compi= le gcc. Is this patch still to be tested? Am I expected to do something to test it?= Or I just wait until a new gfortran version is released? Thanks for the attention in the bug.=