From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 787A53858410; Mon,  8 May 2023 13:50:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 787A53858410
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683553839;
	bh=J6bfh566OJIVI1eaHzxVY0u3+UhhD48g2BClerbP0o0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=sGgta4PFf7BsnoNQdHpWyzYFzo9U4wxpE88Kw+U+GI+TlMLO41gnd1kj0AfEiGpto
	 zCyzPycDlVlEzqj4gTsHYcd+nXGGjA25kdAaqsZ7IebJ3lsqDm8eTCAMZ4c02Xx5Oz
	 adoto60JqU9wTCSqfwglAQDGBFvLR2FGcE4dlt0A=
From: "patrick.begou@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/109646] OpenACC attach directive fails with "pointer
 target not mapped for attach"
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 13:50:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: patrick.begou@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jules at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109646-4-hwTB6H68vq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109646-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109646-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109646

--- Comment #5 from Patrick B=C3=A9gou <patrick.begou@univ-grenoble-alpes.f=
r> ---
Hi Thomas,

yes, I cannot reproduce this problem anymore and the full application compi=
les
now.I think it could be marked solved.
Even if I have a new problem, but at axecution time now. I've posted a new
report last week. Indeed I've only validated the test-case not the full
application as, with this new error, I do not reach this section of code in=
 it.

Thanks
Patrick=