From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2AEC43858D37; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:14:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2AEC43858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682626496;
	bh=4qW+iJDXf3PYPWb36LsprGzW7x3zNcFPM02KxzYEmGc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kp1/VUO54cwFcNWp6+xaBZOwcBdu9Q935KxpyJixf+rmWFUgZEAyq2VBMspdvZQAW
	 FwAX79DvwhpuWKzRkarc3dqnKORQfLjoyhMqIYiby7YlJVwWoxpwFKaJVr9bioNha6
	 +8V1NkfpnysbXYb/5FaC/aQc3XyMuJLeQwMqoK74=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109654] unnecessary "cannot bind packed field to reference"
 error when referenced type has aligned(1) attribute
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 20:14:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status see_also resolution
Message-ID: <bug-109654-4-cvk39b0Gu0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109654-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109654

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D36566
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This won't work for templates or function overloading since GCC does NOT ma=
ngle
the alignment.

This is why it was started to be rejected in the first place.

That is:
```
typedef __attribute__((aligned(1))) int packed_int;

template <class T> T load(T &a);

int load1(int *a)
{
  return load<packed_int>(*a);
}
int load2(int *a)
{
  return load<int>(*a);
}
```

Will both still call load<int> in both cases.=