From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CA4023858C66; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:44:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CA4023858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682671468;
	bh=QK1fos1Oq8VcPVVrttnNMdnjIlgAb1mtv0wcecIALLY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=R1701hrl2/2zpElQr24nte3dU8Q0KzXgP5pqvYxlv90APuFM1ZRfS3eNj15fAlXZ6
	 sfCr5Fmq4iHGWodNa2lDRfd8mbiu8R4M8wgp1V1F5BtwTSADmxFdbofcDypO2VGUDW
	 hvK9qyF8p9hqIf52xfV2Ule6+YMvfU6OvnNETPYE=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109661] [13/14 Regression] ICE in
 aarch64_function_arg_alignment when building erlang
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:44:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109661-4-R1IDbR7xCx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109661-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109661

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Untested fix:

2023-04-28  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR target/109661
        * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_function_arg_alignment): For
        ENUMERAL_TYPEs use alignment of TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (type))
        rather than TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type).

        * g++.dg/other/pr109661.C: New test.

--- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc.jj    2023-04-24 14:54:45.558075512 +0200
+++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc       2023-04-28 10:37:58.013311653 +0200
@@ -7487,6 +7487,9 @@ aarch64_function_arg_alignment (machine_

   if (!AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type))
     {
+      /* For enumeral types use the underlying type if possible.  */
+      if (TREE_CODE (type) =3D=3D ENUMERAL_TYPE && TREE_TYPE (type))
+       type =3D TREE_TYPE (type);
       /* The ABI alignment is the natural alignment of the type, without
         any attributes applied.  Normally this is the alignment of the
         TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT, but not always; see PR108910 for a counterexamp=
le.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/pr109661.C.jj    2023-04-28 10:41:21.1693503=
06
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/pr109661.C       2023-04-28 10:40:46.2468593=
62
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR target/109661
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-w" } */
+
+typedef unsigned long U __attribute__ ((aligned (128)));
+typedef enum : U { V =3D 0 } W;
+
+U
+foo (U a, W b)
+{
+  return a + U (b);
+}

The question is if it is an ABI change from GCC 12 or not (GCC 13 ICEs on i=
t,
so ABI doesn't matter).=