From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 914143858426; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:20:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 914143858426 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1682716826; bh=jUQDuPjyoCjHyzN/1pj3PzuNiyMIDxdaatOSaRVoE9Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MGGlr/n7RtJqyP91ikbbuBSWSYlYSHXIH0LhXjB4DNd26No5Wmb8nFjCgpLyNlPB0 DF7i4dO0kgszLT2o08o0Vw9lHbOlz2BDvJYEfj85EGkfw7hP1+XQzJ7TCt93RgRVOi rgTWYKCZQ5V8SiwoA0Rv40cyx7RYUelETAFEwiJ4= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/109662] bad namelist input but gfortran accepted it Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:20:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109662 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|fortran |libfortran Last reconfirmed| |2023-04-28 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- I also interpret F2018:13.11.3.1 that a value-separator may follow only a name-value subsequence but not immediately the namelist-group-name. This is also what other brands (NAG, Intel, Nvidia) accept. Thus confirmed.=