From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 62E5A3858D37; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:57:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 62E5A3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682693834;
	bh=ULDrM/5s6LQzsY9F30u2HaDDvKv3Xh1OKmbqRqFkdDg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GmsKchYEClHUUbtjx+6KFRfFce2589N6WqZI5PW4OBR8J6hG3nEn6/obKYOiNgZcR
	 uFtJ+ZOZoCnVHksL3rOJQG5PQJDz6KAZTHziRJg+6qwd9HiEizjxCnq+F37Ydaqm7p
	 l844Ff3qolGQ4McQgYuZVFp6GjWPJ3JjuVWPmmJ0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109663] False positive? Converting from initializer list
 would use explicit constructor
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:57:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution
Message-ID: <bug-109663-4-OYC0G7OAJh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109663-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109663-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109663

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|INVALID                     |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> (In reply to Carlos Galvez from comment #0)
> > getting a handful of errors in this type of code compiling in C++14 mod=
e:
>=20
> But the Eigen example has been rejected since r13-6765
>=20
>  c++: explicit ctor and list-initialization [PR109159]

Which means this is a dup of bug 109247.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 109247 ***=