From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9B2243858D28; Thu,  4 May 2023 09:06:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9B2243858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683191160;
	bh=TRMlptUuS34jXEZU2F5PXyRZNkd6ccDx1M9f3jKGmS0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UemrdzF6+W580jpSa85Gckv6GGH/LRJWYXFFJ9NSTNxgRdM9ujLHTilja2LSC7y1P
	 eUlLX3ai99XfaNO8rzGmXsMMKLojALsLfNAXhix2ixdK4ZfnRXDGeLm0Ps27g15n0Q
	 VC6F2JHoKyZhtvQ/DJIYdbno141azDJj0mXYaoD0=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109695] [14 Regression] crash in
 gimple_ranger::range_of_expr since r14-377-gc92b8be9b52b7e
Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 09:06:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109695-4-EHlmlSVsU9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109695-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109695-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109695

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sjames at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #18 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note that on musl, the default stack size is much smaller:
https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html#Thread-st=
ack-size.=