From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A1F643858C33; Wed,  3 May 2023 12:14:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A1F643858C33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683116056;
	bh=KltbnN1wqJ3F7gZRijLrgbuXZcsPaowyZp8EMaxE9Sw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=K3maQ7CQEXuSHOUBcNzJIEIZ4dwradnAXlOw0HSdoyUk/yJ7sugXPfHUt3xOJhX8O
	 DeMhvpq3J7X0EK3mjX0iCuso8N2+bpSMqiGTkBanvFvB4/81jGpxzplji/YLlCqHqf
	 zykcxdmhbHNKdHeQOg/y2EIeBXks0eEhvsZYGS6Y=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109695] [14 Regression] crash in
 gimple_ranger::range_of_expr since r14-377-gc92b8be9b52b7e
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 12:14:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109695-4-NOv7a773ou@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109695-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109695-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109695

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #7)
> The problem was exposed by the newly increased size of int_range_max.  (We
> may want to address that elsewhere)   It has grown an order of magnitude =
in
> size with wide-int.

Yes, 10 times.=