From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1C68E3858CDA; Wed, 3 May 2023 13:06:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1C68E3858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683119173; bh=rEOpQP8vkI3mGqZ9mCkL4wI690kjmGp4hsMuTaZrFek=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M4gEIHF8B2/ggRfKky7JsthJLYrJGol1y119V8ZhBXNQhxKZ9HeBpQUcVCNtxJvuN alrQ86GQYbwY58fULYXT/+klup0APxLaxF70xM2z0cBDHNfKsi8FIb9mzx29eieT+t zF6dOm0LyV1ajIK0+bed3q0FLesZZJxxgHhTg3co= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109695] [14 Regression] crash in gimple_ranger::range_of_expr since r14-377-gc92b8be9b52b7e Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 13:06:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109695 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think even 4080 bytes for int_range_max was quite a lot. I know it perha= ps simplifies stuff a little bit and hopefully copy construction/assignments o= nly copy the actual ranges and not the whole thing, but still.=