public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109695] [14 Regression] crash in gimple_ranger::range_of_expr since r14-377-gc92b8be9b52b7e
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 05:46:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109695-4-jXGLKIyB2Q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109695-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695

--- Comment #38 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #37)
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #36)
> 
> >     For the curious, a particular hot spot for IPA in this area was:
> >     
> >     ipcp_vr_lattice::meet_with_1 (const value_range *other_vr)
> >     {
> >     ...
> >     ...
> >       value_range save (m_vr);
> >       m_vr.union_ (*other_vr);
> >       return m_vr != save;
> >     }
> >     
> >     The problem isn't the resizing (since we do that at most once) but the
> >     fact that for some functions with lots of callers we end up a huge
> >     range that gets copied and compared for every meet operation.  Maybe
> >     the IPA algorithm could be adjusted somehow??.
> 
> isn't the the same thing as 
> 
>   return m_vr.union_ (*other_vr);
> 
> which should be much faster without all the copying... ?

Indeed.  That is in the committed version of the patch.  I just forgot to
update the message.

The reason I didn't originally do as you suggested was that there was a bug in
the union code that returned TRUE for a union that hadn't changed anything. 
That has also been fixed in trunk.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24  5:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-02  9:57 [Bug c/109695] New: crash in gimple_ranger::range_of_expr dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-05-02 10:44 ` [Bug c/109695] " dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-05-02 11:06 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-05-02 12:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109695] [14 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-02 13:43 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-02 13:43 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-02 14:35 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-02 15:02 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-05-02 16:52 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-02 20:37 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-05-03  8:02 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 10:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 12:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109695] [14 Regression] crash in gimple_ranger::range_of_expr since r14-377-gc92b8be9b52b7e jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 12:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 12:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 13:02 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 13:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 14:31 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-05-04  5:51 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-04  9:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-04  9:06 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-04  9:52 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-04 16:01 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-05-04 16:14 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2023-05-04 16:22 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-05-09 12:00 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-09 12:36 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-09 13:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-09 13:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-09 13:28 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-09 14:24 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-09 14:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-09 15:02 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-09 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-10  6:48 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-10 15:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11  4:22 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11  4:31 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-15 17:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-23 21:49 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-05-24  5:46 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-05-24 12:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 12:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 12:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 14:04 ` amacleod at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109695-4-jXGLKIyB2Q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).