From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CE17A3858D1E; Tue, 2 May 2023 17:10:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CE17A3858D1E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683047427; bh=rzU6synt8PYeMBKYbkQWMMkoxGxQJqK+7kaNI9oL9n0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=S47fBxF569fZqe/veGKaBPWUuPEQGKigb3PHB6ySK1UxPlU+jhC+dUQTbPNKnsGui kChAgrTOBW5k5upv4PuehPK7qWAvA6gn9nVT0IXyhEngTJl/1+07A/P4BhSCS2n47I sE54HGCnct3MdUGIUuxm+7cae/GS+GyKjm1Vz9XA= From: "thomas.meltzer1 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/109701] I have a MWE where an omp reduction breaks if I add the option for GPU offloading (even if it isn't used). Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 17:10:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: thomas.meltzer1 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109701 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Meltzer --- Could be related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99928 bu= t I am not sure. In my case the GPU offloading should be ignored.=