public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/109705] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c fails after r14-333-g6d4b59a9356ac4
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 09:13:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109705-4-tDbN83vwH8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 3 May 2023, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109705
>
> Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ever confirmed|0 |1
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
> Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-03
>
> --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> vect_long_mult has
> || (([istarget powerpc*-*-*]
> && ![istarget powerpc-*-linux*paired*])
> && [check_effective_target_ilp32])
> which does not know that p10 has 64x64->64 mult in vectors (and has weird
> parens
> as well :-P ) The linux*paired* case can be removed of course.
>
> Confirmed. Should we open a separate bug for this Power problem, or handle it
> here?
Handle it here - the testcase this PR is about clearly lacks a
vect_long_mult requirement on the dump scanning but both aarch64 and
power seem to get that wrong so the fix wouldn't work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-03 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-03 0:05 [Bug testsuite/109705] New: " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 6:49 ` [Bug testsuite/109705] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 8:19 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-03 9:13 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2024-01-12 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-15 13:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-16 2:56 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-19 15:44 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-22 3:14 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 7:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 17:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 17:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 18:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 18:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-25 21:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 7:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 7:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 21:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 21:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 21:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 22:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-26 22:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-29 2:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-29 3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-109705-4-tDbN83vwH8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).