From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 86E753858D37; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:20:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 86E753858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1706120455; bh=uEax2yvjBCeMc6N5aU0UzNy2L9WHZ0KNZj0UbuYmUC8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hzIat4Cwx1OFIzvdy+h6mcEv0GCel3cNP6fEJl90m+sN2Okj9bu+2cxasm8bsyOgg 2GCMY25q0MJFCyVsnV0EP57ydjV49EexfPSzey9b1w2DlNYcz1oar6v4mLTllDGBYF BNI06de2Y1ToS+P2ViuLrHa4X6HY+ymyRDcD5LlY= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/109705] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr25413a.c fails after r14-333-g6d4b59a9356ac4 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:20:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109705 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Also aarch64 as reported by Christophe. We need vect_long_mult for the > scatter but the effective target looks incomplete. I think the only thing left is updating the testcase to use vect_long_mult since both powerpc and aarch64 have updated/corrected vect_long_mult .=