From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B93393858C33; Wed,  3 May 2023 20:39:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B93393858C33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683146345;
	bh=uGC19srZFBuWL5H7ZOXGTdrTiNs1A+V4Yj89qd9PXFM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=boJon1ar6cP7vs1MDjyhrdz3NOlTby27URZYFyLo6QaxBtj8ncWF9WMCORsxMZQof
	 dgt/aBgj+iuEjhp3XaDojcaa5Srbt3O9DXdwZABhF2lsEpV1mwVki01wQlzwgv1zp1
	 d96hfA4qo20ZJmcwxMg/7KPWOgdnrrpwcs6+4lyI=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109719] Truncated frame-pointer unwinding via Linux perf
 with g++
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 20:39:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109719-4-mcVCz2IiEJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109719-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109719-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109719

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Christian Hergert from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > HUH? omit frame pointer is on by default on x86_64.
>=20
> Yes, Fedora 38 changed the default compiler flags to
> `-fno-omit-frame-pointer` so that the system can be profiled more reliabl=
y.

So you should report this to Fedora's team.

>=20
> > What target is this on?
>=20
> x86_64
>=20
> > What exact command line is being used to compile the sources? If this on
> > x86_64, you might still need -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer too.
>=20
> No doubt, I have `-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer` too.

I am suspecting the issue is inside the linux kernel ...

Anyways we need much more information here.
A sample simple program which shows that GCC is doing the wrong thing.
Maybe it is the linux frame pointer walker going wrong.=