From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CAABF3858D28; Thu,  4 May 2023 06:20:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CAABF3858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683181208;
	bh=CprChzG+gsiXdfL8m9f9UdyiQ5vbvXM095Y+5Yre//k=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Nc8UCbb42nW7v/OjUsEk5TGw1xhuvlUoCkMAaECRbx51gfFqUVp5MQUAQLyGg/D+R
	 NZ7GEdQwd2NfH7wlSCN3bytDQ3jgYcBEKgaBCanJKy2MgPk6Rt0cIlT2eL9W3mIw+D
	 jk8uIcw1uNigclhlcci0E07Eb2PuI+gYJHpBm01Y=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109724] [10 regression] Huge memory usage when building
 qtwebengine's SkOpAngle.cpp since r10-11201-g051f78a5c1d699
Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 06:20:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.4.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status assigned_to target_milestone
 everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-109724-4-RJ9EAFgAsf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109724

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |needs-bisection
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |rguenth at gcc dot =
gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |10.5
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-05-04

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Huh, interesting.

Did you by chance verify if GCC 11, 12 or 13 are affected similarly?

I wonder if we can bisect what fixed it if not.=