From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0FD263858CDB; Thu, 4 May 2023 18:31:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0FD263858CDB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683225111; bh=d1G0OR/Qqrtn8YQfVCgAXAZMVYjufB1jl9jrUzUSeog=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ujtJkLSoeyg7b92V9YwX7UuYCcxJV+PB2iscZAjwzIC9mXB+l5nXsDjAki54GhAYh MuMuH57U1dijtlr59OvyRHmnzckt7X6ZagPOuNwDQWg5JhClQAJcWz2m+qdGMjDcbp LdC+70yj0P3WzEL39DvoUE2hB/BGg8AwhzGjwmh4= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109741] alignas(64) in libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/shared_ptr.cc Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 18:31:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109741 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11) > > Perhaps it should at configure time check if such alignment is possible= and > > otherwise simply don't align it beyond mutex natural alignment? >=20 > Agreed. We could as well for those arches use just larger unaligned buffer and align manually.=