From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DD6863858D20; Fri,  5 May 2023 12:21:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DD6863858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683289265;
	bh=4URUg3matpNq5suUC/3R/OL6P5RTM40eUXGGRx40bzM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LokDJIvq4VdSBUIFE4d7ybh4eJTX+Nak/emE4TQwrpGybYS3tzdH1ASabb2n2LR1D
	 hcoX3fbCJa35yI+crY1hqkkl4GYrDS3i+n3EYfPQ+N+6WTmLW4Q47XAacoygFLGxuw
	 gGaBMz8yUo4XM7+jyPrYRWGnqARd4bZXSLhRHd1E=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109746] Fails removing redundant comparison
 in for loop over multiple variables, unless members of struct
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 12:21:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-109746-4-alyHioXp5V@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109746-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109746-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109746

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Probably some pass ordering issue.=