From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B3E253858D32; Mon,  8 May 2023 06:20:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B3E253858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683526844;
	bh=fpNhNpdrv7k0eaNmaSceA2Tc7O0yHwa/REqYyMasNXE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UH5FoDWnBvS5+bT5ZL1Z6rWkSGgqPhGABbjAbphWpiMhsZU7b5a02mYMo4uxWcQJg
	 31H5vByqI/0B1Hg+3v2gPUspr0lQ81fBaSl9B5s7mcZrWKqa4V7TATaWSnlUAN18LK
	 zIl4lK8yrOIw92lgurpbsqANqyiep5Cftu3q9pR8=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109749] new test case g++.dg/vect/pr109573.cc
 ICEs with checks turned on
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 06:20:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-109749-4-TOKCLdBQsy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109749-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109749-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109749

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yep, this is known, a fix is difficult (well, removing the assert...).  I've
nevertheless backported the original fix since it demotes the assert to a
checking assert.

See the original PR which Jakub re-opened.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 109573 ***=