From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B87273858C2B; Tue, 9 May 2023 21:24:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B87273858C2B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683667467; bh=kQpGxJOioY/gHvvJpFgq+1GJZdrIUr1DrQnl2vZ1KsU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gyQkA/eu7kMwL1qLlKnqmd8K47BnhmKfXe1ddpxnr+RVUAq4tWVq8rHFsI6Oin25W 6pW0Xjk66uZLs/ZqJ/YWp19R6HqZQDL3EiiEucPbVs2QadfmfE0CcC6hANmmuU9l87 wMuiJ5WHwvfumetU7jaybq+aVSHTG865MLuwCId0= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/109751] [13/14 Regression] boost iterator_interface fails concept check starting in gcc-13 Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 21:24:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords target_milestone short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109751 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |rejects-valid Target Milestone|--- |13.2 Summary|boost iterator_interface |[13/14 Regression] boost |fails concept check |iterator_interface fails |starting in gcc-13 |concept check starting in | |gcc-13 --- Comment #19 from Patrick Palka --- We may want to consider reverting / adjusting the r13-4035 change for GCC 1= 3.2, since CWG2596 hasn't been formally adopted (and so strictly speaking this i= s a rejects-valid bug IIUC).=