From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C636E3858C66; Mon,  8 May 2023 15:46:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C636E3858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683560810;
	bh=+IatA9xQhm2844rjOKb2NARweQDQLHfmctx7dbiA914=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pyYKNzPmQkrBcVGhVi0wZlmKr57RQYkA6Db/BeC0mJculto8DrNl+EIOZzhXrdSoX
	 N9S0HhGvs9N9fTREFPpuD7DJ+yzGW+PQ7exDNNNlDZHXSkHuzL9iSmLx4TinDu8Zgo
	 rZfgSLEoCIv/qEyyjSHG4XwOzHsdsCa5GvpfNcGg=
From: "ldalessandro at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109751] boost iterator_interface fails concept check
 starting in gcc-13
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 15:46:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ldalessandro at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109751-4-OxJY4clZ10@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109751-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109751-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109751

--- Comment #16 from Luke Dalessandro <ldalessandro at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Luke Dalessandro from comment #15)
> Thanks for looking at this.=20
> [...]
>
> Also, from what I understand, I should report Andrew's reduced case as a =
bug
> in clang, and msvc (and maybe nvc++ with its different front-end), which I
> will do.

I realized that this is almost certainly IFNDR so there isn't any need for =
me
to create these reports.=