From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4897C3858C52; Fri, 5 May 2023 18:14:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4897C3858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683310452; bh=UOULBkdA6jMsW3388zMwZdhCEklyRrJhZAooW0Z9R5E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=T2+mkxs4B3gDLSeBJkZHkNfocTpwfrXXwkHa2SnNRtTi7JXXRqmg/Y+AwqiBXH7Zs FvyPUmNhbNMfIw+g3OAlIl279M/lUuk5Bew7uo0sqqanCWrn6sot4snqDHfK6++Y0l y+i4HVGsBqhjOVvEit+tKIZYNZAN3zHU23HLUAX4= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/109751] boost iterator_interface fails concept check starting in gcc-13 Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 18:14:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109751 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Luke Dalessandro from comment #5) > Ah, I didn't realize that. If you want to close one of the two issues tha= t's > fine with me. I sort of thought two different things were going on. The ICE might not be related so keeping both open until it is figured out is good.=