From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 32E0E3858C41; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:35:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 32E0E3858C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704908123;
	bh=AewfiDzfxqaXZ+zadEWFiJIiI1kxg8pSfWVaFZh1Kk8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=I5loJfKkQ8lulnVi+xbMFCM5WJoQWokeN/SELiwyEqBQMFcntnQTLEW2AURfccWWT
	 83dPW2q1XXgcjMQkN0lHxT4I2pZJmo70LYOB8BUfak0lKcOYcgw7Jmg0LuTrjg/Q1f
	 tWQ+HveYgQ5/uishihOewMdTJkEioDwjSVLWdUWM=
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109753] [13/14 Regression] pragma GCC target causes
 std::vector not to compile (always_inline on constructor)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:35:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-109753-4-VkuQMCoYoG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109753

Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needs-bisection             |

--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It seems there is nothing to bisect any more, please re-add the keyword if =
I am
wrong.=