From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CCE803858D35; Sat, 6 May 2023 16:40:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CCE803858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683391239; bh=ykWe7b9rxUGdYLcszGUsl1wVyZG5jNkJLVI5o8fnDrw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JbfQZn8oYcu5vn3MoUBV9PB0Dr/fLjzbtvGWYoGBDB4PvKOAIJW6z3m23rwn1buhd x/NoBOSo6b3jKdsFk5XFILpHfhMl+9T0sIAsVgyycwNfmCqmu1Cp5gh9BYLjTUViBp FcZI4bJ0HCxJhULaTkrijCYBdArnidWawpxxj3Mc= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/109756] "internal compiler error: tree check" when using the [[assume]] attribute with pack expansion Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 16:40:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109756 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|ice-on-valid-code | Last reconfirmed| |2023-05-06 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. clang rejects it: :2:26: error: attribute 'assume' cannot be used as an attribute pack [[assume(args > 0)...]]; ^ While MSVC accepts it. I am not sure if it is this is valid or not but GCC should NOT be ICEing ei= ther way.=