From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E98C83858D3C; Sun, 7 May 2023 19:02:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E98C83858D3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683486178; bh=Pl3X82O8wyH1Zm/ZSZBOTubh1BP/06xlGAnGNaFWlMo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qiPdiU0dJq3bVzoxiu2EiXZLhbzqn4r6VZA03F5W3tTCi3y4hBBZCGWckrOkNodeV i8AwRU3e4BIj2k4uU7V8Mz7OfbRarqKCRD4TYp9n0x+GBorCPymgTxPow3hbu9Tgm1 5BqZcAimYBuZZ1ujDRffQVv2Px7t7hoLAbW+4RzI= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/109756] "internal compiler error: tree check" when using the [[assume]] attribute with pack expansion Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 19:02:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109756 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org, | |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Trying other standard attributes, we accept template [[noreturn...]] [[deprecated...]] [[nodiscard...]] int foo (int x) { switch (x) { case 1: [[likely...]]; [[fallthrough...]]; case 2: [[unlikely...]]; break; default: break; } struct T {}; struct S { [[no_unique_address...]] T t; }; for (;;) ; } int a =3D foo <1, 2, 3> (4); and just emit the deprecated warning, while clang++ rejects all those.=