From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6C3923858D28; Sat, 6 May 2023 23:44:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6C3923858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1683416676; bh=Aba17KpCTORwMXPQThGRoXT+9XXmcN9cWYrtKfyWE9Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mKPeDZimJcoWwAuXIHGhpvbDuOsV8u7rFVTKE0KORtuzzB79XeWxlaE1h5eORCyRZ +aLU1CGE+kxpPbDF5iAdPJsf3A2rlhGwuNGhiy8Ypyh6Pj9T25jgIXq3V+wGOeOoy1 weyaXqLuIGB7pNHUUKo0aUKBCakFuq/rLYjUVOZk= From: "andysem at mail dot ru" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/109761] Nested class destructor's noexcept specification incorrectly considered as too loose compared to the outer class Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 23:44:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: andysem at mail dot ru X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109761 --- Comment #2 from andysem at mail dot ru --- I don't see how completeness of outer is related to nested's destructor. Or= put it another way, how nested's destructor noexcept specification has anything= to do with outer, whether it is completed or not.=