From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 83C3E3858D28; Sat,  6 May 2023 23:41:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 83C3E3858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683416480;
	bh=wf4TOK3ikORAsYbEQA8SPyWL1I31smerGlHKlZT4lbc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=CwJYZOEIOirJfvh0CfWLiIymP2gAVXZiXmF65e8Ri3mTD4Jk2iF2CGPyKar5i4xq4
	 wAUCarI40WnLOqojPKBVtFiRAX9bN6LwDLCA/FdG9xgYNba6XgsFkIxg4WlYP0s5zX
	 yAnBiip3qFHMY8Q+ipU+9b845tg+cQzvY9/rwJBk=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109761] Nested class destructor's noexcept specification
 incorrectly considered as too loose compared to the outer class
Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 23:41:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109761-4-90Skc7XnhB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109761-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109761-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109761

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this is correct beahvior because outer is not complete until the ou=
ter
is closed.=