From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D978D3858D39; Sat,  6 May 2023 23:58:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D978D3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683417538;
	bh=Nyt/sgUc6o6a1UhkPyN8x3XVFNu05+0l4C+eP+GztTU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DtwFmy1mkoXjEpa6g9qjZrGH0qaJ0kVKvmcdfjo2tdfhZsS8k8bdmJFxR1oZplTT7
	 hdpAJPgzigt6GxJu+/44XIJmnnOsAvDi3FI87TpnpakYZX7VvpoCKKF3FODTtLqUBp
	 fBKAfygAmPQt+G4uYtReBHh95e9/h+aG8GfiUW6w=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109761] Nested class destructor's noexcept specification
 incorrectly considered as too loose compared to the outer class
Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 23:58:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cf_known_to_fail keywords
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-109761-4-wf6GpyviBf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109761-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109761-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109761

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
      Known to fail|                            |10.1.0
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-05-06

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like I am wrong but the fix for delaying noexec is doing a search of =
the
wrong dtor it looks like.

Anyways confirmed.
Also it has always been broken so not a regression.=