From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BBF103858D35; Mon,  8 May 2023 13:31:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BBF103858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683552701;
	bh=R9ZMpHPoTVP+FHDERl/831GsG9qnkBcAwXz5/dDNCdU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=WQypNrKDutDl2lhTYN/EBnq6lf6hGXQz2hDY4poo8UdoRbtwzOIPhBXowtRA+qzVp
	 X7wKXTJcTz3rdn+OUH4B2bTyv7o35SrpvGbi8vZN8K+K/DrModC+C2S2cL3tA/lZNz
	 tYKkLQ+S6CkZUP1YbPH9G/daoyBL58wd1GN2ZGbw=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/109770] wrong(?) devirtualization
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 13:31:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109770-4-IZ0b2uxlgX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109770-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109770-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109770

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I cannot find a clause in the C++ standard constraining the object returned=
 by
a new expression (well, not clearly enough) nor whether re-using the object
storage during construction is allowed.=