From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 371613858D35; Mon,  8 May 2023 16:57:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 371613858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1683565030;
	bh=zIq75T/mpiygPM1juF7yJu36p4ArQ/9ukxWGpPLciVU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=a2Rr41g7/NJt102y1OrNSPhslqXNe8vbwUk3+/TIPjjDrWw0eF8Ut+B2e7/ABHPag
	 QZqzZynJfvWi7S7XwhH7DRSrkKcncpqOWEUh1eCccHbRuNT0jo/Ra0ekEAmTdT+QNz
	 kt018ASzM+YuQcFvNjhfXElcAnymtXCLU53Zl/+8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/109776] [14 Regression] pr81192 fails on some targets
 after recent propagator changes
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 16:57:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-109776-4-NgsOcIl7dH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109776-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109776

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |testsuite-fail

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>I suspect the testsuite needs further twiddling to work on 16bit int targe=
ts.

Actually it looks like a gimple front-end issue really.
iftmp2_8 and j and c0_1 are all declared as int types rather than long int.=
 So
the testcase seems correct.

Do other gcc.dg/gimplefe-* testcase fail on this target too?=